Talk:FKM

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PolymersWikipedia:WikiProject PolymersTemplate:WikiProject PolymersPolymers articles

United States: Delaware Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Delaware portal This article is supported by WikiProject Delaware (assessed as Low-importance).

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Todo

add references to ASTM D1418 proposal

describe/explain:
- VDF
- HFP
- TFE
- PMVE

--Pphh 15:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused, these are abbreviations to the chemicals written just prior to them. Isn't this obvious?Delmlsfan 23:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely right, but as you can see from the article's history those descriptions didn't exist when the todos were published here. 159.235.52.252 12:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FKM vs Fluoroelastomer

Common usage in the US (at least) is the word fluoroelastomer for vinylidene-fluoride-based elastomers. Even this article uses the term. FKM is only an abbreviation. Should this entire content be listed under fluoroelastomer instead? Delmlsfan 03:36, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

as the article describes FKMs are not the only kind of fluoroelastomers 159.235.52.252 12:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FPM = another abbreviation for Fluorinated propylene monomer?

A search for "FPM" (to find out what it means relating to materials of construction for a pump) landed me on a disambiguation page. I selected "Fluorinated propylene monomer" as the item I was probably looking for, which took me to "FKM". I see no reference to FPM on the FKM page. Is FPM an appropriate alternative abbreviation? If so, please add this somewhere (including disambiguation page). Thanks.--CheMechanical (talk) 17:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good suggestion. The type 4 and type 5 FKMs are sometimes called FEPM (not FPM). So FEPM is the correct abbreviation. Delmlsfan (talk) 15:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FPM is not in ISO 1629. I have revision of ISO 1629 : 1995 and it is called FKM in there. Also in ISO 1629 : 2013 it is always FKM. I do not know if it was maybe before than 1995 called FPM in ISO 1629 or in some other ISO standard, or if FPM is used in DIN standard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.55.84.70 (talk) 07:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ionic Crosslinking

Ionic crosslinking is the preferred terminology among users of FKM today. Please do not revert this edit. Delmlsfan (talk) 01:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide a WP:Source for that? In general, the article is in need of appropriate independent reliable sources to demonstrate notability. -Shootbamboo (talk) 02:18, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

External link http://www.zrunek.at/download/ZruElast%20FPM%20UK.pdf not functional.

Correction anyone?

Westoby (talk) 09:59, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Wizard191 (talk) 13:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Viton

CLOSED

Agree to merging of the article(s) as no opposition has been expressed over an extended period. GenQuest ^"scribble" 12:38, 29 March 2021 (UTC) Non-Administrative closure[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The Viton article is a redundant WP:POVFORK of this. The encyclopedic information there is largely duplicative of this article, and the rest of it appears to serve a spammy, promotional purpose for a specific brand name (and it was not the only one; in the course of ensuring that the other brand names mentioned herein redirected to this article, I found that one was going to the company in a promotional manner, and two had once been articles that were speedily deleted as "unambiguous promotion"). The lead of the present (target) article is also problematic in this regard, over-dwelling on company and brand names, while the entire article is almost devoid of meaningful information about the properties of this substance and why it's appropriate for the various claimed applications. We need to move all the manufacturer and brand name material to a section for that, other than mention that it was originally developed by DuPont (1802–2017), then improve the main article text and its lead. I've alerted WT:CHEM to this discussion. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 14:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Abbreviation?

I can't find any information on what, exactly, FKM stands for, but I think it should be included in this article. I'd assume the F is "fluorine" or "fluoro-something", but if anyone can find what the K and M stand for, please add it, my curiosity is getting the better of me! 72.35.141.122 (talk) 17:38, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]