Talk:FC Barcelona/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: no disambiguations found

Link rot: I found and fixed two dead links using WP:CHECKLINKS diff

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I made a number of copy-edits to imporve grammar, coherenece and style.diff

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References check out, I fixed two dead links, all sources support statements, all sources appear reliable. I assume good faith for off-line sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Through, detailed and concise

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Page is protected to prevent vandalism

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images are licensed or tagged and captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I have no hesitation in passing this interesting article as a worthy of GA status. If you wish to take this further to WP:FAC you may need to add alt etxt to the images and proviode citations for all statistics. I could confirm the majoroity of the stats through my own offline sources, but further evidence may need to be provided at FAC. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC)