Talk:Extinct isotopes of superheavy elements

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

244Pu detection

Although scientific evidence might be sky high, the prove to the presence of 244Pu outside the laboratory - and especially in Gy old samples - is only circumstantial. The use of the verbs in the article suggest a real detection in those old samples. I just don't know how to rephrase the sentences to express the evidence is overwhelming but without saying 244Pu was there.T.vanschaik (talk) 08:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The evidence is actually even higher, since we have found live 244Pu of interstellar origin (from the r-process in nearby supernovae) on Earth. What I do wonder is how Pu is relevant to this article, as it's not superheavy; if it is to remain, perhaps "transuranium" is better, and then we should also consider extinct 247Cm. Double sharp (talk) 05:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

validity?

So far, I haven't seen any really good info on this topic and it feels like a bunch of unreliably info gathered by folks trying to make The Next Big Things. Should we subsume this page into another or delete? 2601:CA:8280:880:349C:48E1:9F9:4139 (talk) 16:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]