Talk:Express Scripts

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Missouri

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

St. Louis Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject St. Louis, a project to build and improve articles related to St. Louis and the surrounding metropolitan area. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.St. LouisWikipedia:WikiProject St. LouisTemplate:WikiProject St. LouisSt. Louis articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Untitled

The article reads like a financial blurb. "..process one out of every six presciptions in the US.." and list of offices make it NPOV. D.valued 06:20, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The "one out of every six...." line was removed. I went ahead and killed the tag. I don't see how a list of offices expresses a point of view, but if you disagree, please feel free to retag it. Sperril 08:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This Entire Article Is Ridiculous

This is the most blatant example of spam I've ever seen on Wikipedia, and I've read the McDonald's article. I'm going to spend some time digging up some actual facts on ESRX and redo this entire article. I'm also going to put it on watch so that if the spam creeps back a protection can be requested. --Texmexp 01:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting rid of the list of awards is a start FancyPants 19:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did not mean to enter this as spam

Surely Spam is not something i'm trying to do. i did not feel the article was spamming at all. Sorry!

Reemusk 06:10, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposed (ValueRx)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was Merge ValueRx into Express Scripts Incorporated, by silent consensus. --B. Wolterding 14:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge the content of ValueRx into here, since the notability of that article has been questioned, and in fact very few sources are cited in the article. It might be best to merge it into a "history" section in the Express Scripts Incorporated article.

Please add your comments below. Proposed as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 13:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Fair use rationale for Image:EsiLogo.gif

Image:EsiLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I work on behalf of Express Scripts and am interested in talking with a Wiki Editor to provide recommended fact-based, cited content to update this page. Please let me know if anyone is interested in and I will be happy to discuss further. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WashingtonWikiUser (talk • contribs) 19:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

biased and uncited

last paragraph is biased and uncited — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.211.190.12 (talk) 18:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"North St. Louis County"

The term North St. Louis County--with North capitalized--is used twice in this article. Is there such a place, or should it be "northern" St. Louis County? 173.90.75.20 (talk) 23:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]