Talk:Estazolam
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Estazolam.
|
Neither Specific nor Objective
In its current incarnation, this article is largely an invective against all benzodiazepine medications and provides little objective data on estazolam.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.18.19.169 (talk) 02:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
The article was listed as "start class", I have updated it to "C class". Estazolam is not available in very many countries world wide and is not very commonly prescribed so development of this wiki article has been largely dormant. I have updated the article with information regarding its benefits in the short term management of insomnia as well as other relevant data specific to estazolam. There is not that many publications in the medical literature specifically concerning estazolam. The majority of the recent medical literature is critical of benzodiazepines.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 18:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Gave the article a partial proofreading against references. Article needs review w.r.t. relevance of animal experiments to human pharmacology. Clinical pharmacology to be kept separate from highly speculative animal and in-vitro. 70.137.182.228 (talk) 23:16, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Good job anon, a lot of those edits were old edits. I tweaked some of your edits. There is very little information on estazolam in the literature to write up a proper article on it.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 17:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Estazolam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081006134201/http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/NEW00625.html to http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/NEW00625.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Estazolam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070709230745/http://www.medworksmedia.com/psychopharmbulletin/pdf/12/010-029_PB%20W03_Wang_final.pdf to http://www.medworksmedia.com/psychopharmbulletin/pdf/12/010-029_PB%20W03_Wang_final.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Tolerance and dependence — Elderly
The last sentence of Tolerance and dependence, "The short-term benefits of benzodiazepines on sleep begin to reduce after a few days due to tolerance to the hypnotic effects of benzodiazepines in the elderly.[13]", belongs in the following section Elderly; the ref cited is explicitly re elderly. Actually, the comment applies to all ages, and should stand (with a different cite) in this section without the "elderly" qualification or as "..., particularly in the elderly". I don't have time right now to check out the refs, this note is a reminder to self but feel free to jump in and make the change. D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 22:17, 16 August 2022 (UTC)