Talk:Epirote Greek

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Partial presentation of sourced material

I wonder why Fillos statement on the issue shouldn't be presented: Crossland posited a posited (partial) Hellenization of pre-classical Epirus, with Greek elites rulinng over non-Greek populations; cf. Nilsson (1909). A very brief synopsis of older works and views is available in Kokoszko&Witczak (2009,112) who in turn also favor a 'Hellenization' scenario Nonetheless, such views, which rely largely on some subjective ancient testimonies, are no supported by the earliest (and not only) epigraphic evidence.. This is actually his conclusion which was not included inside the text.Alexikoua (talk) 19:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was already covered.--Calthinus (talk) 21:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Epirote Greek

Partial presentation of sourced material

Navigation menu

Search