Talk:Emperor penguin

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Featured articleEmperor penguin is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 18, 2009.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 20, 2008Good article nomineeListed
April 5, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Featured article?

Does it still deserve to be called so? I see 2 [citation needed] tags, 1 [peacock term] tag and one [not in citation given] tag. Someone pls fix those, else supporting statements should be removed. I don't edit articles on wildlife, I just check how good they are. Kailash29792 (talk) 19:33, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did much of the work on it many moons ago. The best thing about FA status is that it acts as an index point to measure future changes against. Will do so later today. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:45, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have to hold up my hand for the offending lead sentence. Actually I have learnt better since to just let the facts speak for themselves. I have dealt with 2 [citation needed] tags and removed the peacock sentence. I can't see the other one. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:01, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Its alright, i fixed the [not in citation] issue. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's an informative article, although it lacks information about sexual dimorphism. I copy edited a section today, and I fear that a thorough copy editing is needed to preserve the featured-article status, particularly after having excised the hyphen in "heavily-studied". is a 00:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The last bit of the section (with the unformatted ref) is new I think. The section above it was all present tense apart from one perfect tense ("has shown") - I don't care whether it is present or past, as long as it is consistent. I did think perfect tense was alright with the present tense. I don't see a problem with "heavily-studied", but am not fussed whether there is a hyphen there or not. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is not a, the article has comparative wieghts and reports that the plumage is similar, so I am not sure what you think is missing regarding sexual dimorphism....can you please elaborate? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:05, 28 January

Outdated "Relationship with humans" section

The "Relationship with humans" section is outdated. Emperor Penguins are kept in captivity in four places and three of those have bred it: SeaWorld San Diego (USA; by far the most succesful in breeding, see wiki article), Port of Nagoya Public Aquarium (Japan; kept but not bred yet), Wakayama Adventure World (Japan; incl. breeding) and Laohutan Ocean Park (China; incl. breeding). 62.107.210.43 (talk) 17:24, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Right, updated now. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:31, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Breeding Location

"It almost always breeds on stable pack ice near the coast and up to 18 km (11 mi) offshore."

then later:

"The yearly reproductive cycle begins at the start of the Antarctic winter, in March and April, when all mature Emperor Penguins travel to colonial nesting areas, often walking 50 to 120 km (31 to 75 mi) inland from the edge of the pack ice."

Maybe showing my ignorance but I can't make much sense of these. Words like offshore and inland are unclear when there's ice off the coast. Nigej (talk) 09:51, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dogs and penguins

When dogs were present in Antarctica, did they prey upon penguins? Dogs are by nature big-game killers.Pbrower2a (talk) 06:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dogs were removed on the fear that that carried Canine Distemper or other diseases which might affect seals. Sadly the British Antarctic Survey dogs all died of typical dog diseases within a few years of their return [1] presumably because they had spent generations in a isolated environment.

References

  1. ^ http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/about_antarctica/environment/wildlife/removal_of_sledge_dogs.php. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Emperor penguin. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:27, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claims in Antarctica

Is there any reason to call out the Taylor Glacier as being in the Australian Antarctic Territory instead of saying Victoria Land? Most countries don't recognize claims in Antarctica. Sowelilitokiemu (talk) 17:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point. Changed. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emperor penguin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Emperor penguin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emperor penguin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained phrasing/spelling changes

Eblackadder3, please explain why you have not been using edit summaries while editing this featured article for the past 9 months. I reverted the first edit you made in July because you added content without it being clear whether or not that was present in the listed source – do you understand what that means? Rhinopias (talk) 23:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Rhinopias: for posting. I'd seen some changes in passing but had not looked in depth until I saw the summary of the differences above. Some changes are improvements but most are adding redundant emotional words, repeating material that does not need repeating or (more worryingly) the changing of numbers without changing the source. I've gone through the article and reviewed all changes. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:30, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, thank you for actually making the changes! Too daunting of a task for me right now. I've posted on Eblackadder3's talk page also (which they have never edited). If we do not receive a response from them and they continue to edit the article, we can suggest a block at ANI until they say they'll participate... Rhinopias (talk) 00:37, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disappearance of the Halley Bay Colony

In 2016 the Halley Bay Colony essentially disappeared when bad weather destroyed the sea-ice the colony was on. This caused the chicks to drown and the adults to abandon the colony. The adults have not seemed to make an attempted to reestablish the colony and the ice did not reform in 2017 or 2018, but the Dawson-Lambton Colony has seen a rise in numbers since:

Amos, Jonathan (2019-04-25). "Thousands of penguin chicks wiped out". Retrieved 2019-04-25.

Should this be included? Should it have its own section? It seems relevant and important to me, but I have not edited the article because I'm not sure how/if it would best be included. Downfall Vision (talk) 10:57, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded on Jchevali's addition. I think it's appropriate here, as long as the section doesn't get too long/convoluted with examples that don't add much. Sentences could probably get reordered... Rhinopias (talk) 23:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded a photo of the Halley Emperor colony in 1998,99 incase it proves to be of use

Halley Emperor Penguin colony

Just added that photo to the relevant section. Mtpaley (talk) 18:46, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Without a comparison image showing population size I don't think the image adds anything to the section. If Halley Bay didn't redirect to the research station, there could be content about the penguin colony and a photo there... Rhinopias (talk) 21:51, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Its a bird, it's a plane, it's (not) superman

I don't see anywhere in the lead or taxonomy, where I'd expect to find it, that an Emperor Penguin is a bird. I think most people know, but it's not patently obvious that it isn't for example, an aquatic mammal. That it is a bird is mentioned a few times under other sections, but what an animal is should be in the lead, eh? Sbalfour (talk) 21:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sbalfour:, don't you think saying it is a penguin is more exacting and informative? And saying both would be labouring the point I suspect....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:26, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 August 2020

184.91.55.159 (talk) 14:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  Darth Flappy «Talk» 14:53, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Height

There are plenty of youtube videos that show the Emperor Penguins height is less than 3 feet. The article said something else. Any thoughts on a reliable reference for height? Thanks, Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 04:01, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Threatened

They are now threatened as of today, someone needs to come in and change it. Thanks. Flossingjonah (talk) 06:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with the range map

For some reason, the range map in the speciesbox template displays as a link and not as an image. I commented it out because I can't figure out how to fix it. Michael7604 (talk) 03:58, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Michael7604 Testing with using example.png displays OK, so this seems to be some kind of problem with File:Manchot empereur carte reparition.png itself. Note that it's just displaying as a link in the same way here, using the normal image syntax - perhaps there is something in it that is breaking the thumbnailer? Andrew Gray (talk) 11:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed: It is caused by a bad PNG header, so you can easily fix it by downloading, opening in mspaint or paint.net, re-saving, and uploading as new version. Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#PNG_thumbnail_problem Michael7604 (talk) 19:11, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 February 2024

e 32.220.136.226 (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{ Not done It's unclear what changes you would like to be made. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Emperor_penguin"