Talk:Eluned Morgan, Baroness Morgan of Ely

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rename

I would like to rename per WP:NC to Eluned Morgan (politician). Any comments please? AndrewRT(Talk) 17:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed per WP:NCPEER. Kittybrewster 20:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move per proposal. Plurality supports a move, and given the need for disambiguation, the arguments for the current name ring hollow. Orlady (talk) 04:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Eluned Morgan (politician)Eluned Morgan, Baroness Morgan of Ely.

Oppose - Better known as a politician in general. Was not a peer and MEP so is begtter known without the title.--Lucy-marie (talk) 14:27, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. WP:NCPEER is quite clear. This peeress is no longer wholly or exclusively known by her pre-peerage nomenclature. Disambiguation very much needed there are 2 Eluned Morgans and 3 Baroness Morgans. Kittybrewster 15:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose in the strongest possible terms for consistency in naming per policy and guidelines like WP:COMMONNAME, WP:TITLE, WP:D and WP:PRECISION that apply to all Wikipedia article titles. The subject is most commonly known by the current title (disambiguated per WP:D); adding peerage information is additional precision that is completely unnecessary, all good reasons to ignore WP:NCPEER. --Born2cycle (talk) 20:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:NCPEER. Disambiguation is needed, and using the title is the correct way to disambiguate per WP:NCPEER.
    B2C's arguments are bogus, because the policy WP:TITLE explicitly permits topic-specific naming conventions such as WP:NCPEER. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:59, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - useful for disambiguation. Deb (talk) 12:39, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The best way to disambiguate. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Need to improve references

There is a surprising amount of biographical information on this page without references. I've added the refimprove tag and I'm now going to spend some time trying to get some references. I'm also a bit troubled by potentially close association to this article by some of the users who have edited this page in the past, including a user called User:Eluned_Morgan, but I won't jump to any conclusions at the moment. Seaweed (talk) 09:12, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some references and removed some non-notable information. It's quite tricky to find good, verifiable references because I think that many websites that come up in searches with biographical information probably have got their information from this very Wikipedia page in the past (i.e. without good or any references).Seaweed (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]