Talk:Early history of South Africa

South Africa Top‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa Top‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Athompki.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

"the Bushmen had great respect for the land, and their lifestyle had low environmental impact" -- a certain awe of nature is common for hunter gatherers but a low environmental impact is not a natural result of this. In america where the wildlife was not evolved alongside humans hunther gatherers wiped out a lot of the indigenous species in a relatively short time.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.177.138.109 (talk) 11:51, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reference, please. I disagree with this statement. Genetikbliss (talk) 01:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Needs edit

The summary is too short and is not an adequate representation of what the article talks about. There are no citations for linked references and some of the points are not referenced at all. The article itself needs some expansion and more detail concerning geography, ages after the paleolithic, conflict, religion, and so on. Pictures and maps would also help.

Athompki (talk) 04:51, 8 November 2017 (UTC)athompki[reply]

Why is generally Khoisan taken as indigenous in South Africa

Khoisan a combination of San people said to be the first nation and Khoikhoi claimed to be the 1st expansion of the 1st century CE here them taken as indigenous, but those of another ancient migration are laxly taken as so like the theorized Bantu expansion in the 3rd century CE. It really baffles reason as to being ulterior motives than sense to writing about these people, it's as if to make Bantu speakers non-Africans of people who just rained from the sky as to cause an unwarrantable satisfaction to the current situations of the 21st century in South Africa between the Indigenous populace and non-indigenous minorities, at the cost of the Indigenous interests. Untrammeled (talk) 14:40, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Early history of South Africa

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Untitled

Needs edit

Why is generally Khoisan taken as indigenous in South Africa

Navigation menu

Search