Talk:Dinheirosaurus/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs) 18:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

This aritlce is written in acceptable prose. It doesn't contain punctuation, spelling, capitalization or grammar mistakes.

However, the lead section can be improved and styled. Gug01 (talk) 22:54, 24 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]

Referencing and plagiarism

This article is not plagiarized. It properly attributes any copied material to its source. There are inline citations, but there are multiple mistakes that cannot be easily fixed in the {{cite book}} template (chapter/page is unnatributed multiple times).

Done. IJReid (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review it: Now that the references has been cleaned up, I can say the referencing is perfect. Gug01 (talk) 20:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]

Point of view and covering

This article is written from a neutral point of view. This article in addition broadly covers over a subject, and goes into detail where necessary.

Stability

This article is stable. It has had no edit wars in its history, and is not undergoing a current edit war.

Overview

Although the majority of the article is good, the problem with the referencing is serious. As I cannot fix this referencing, I will put it on hold to see if the article will be fixed in a few months. The chapter/page needs to be attributed to the books.

Review the review a few hours later: This article is now perfect to be a good article. Thus, it is now a good article and no longer just a nominee.