Talk:Diana Nemorensis/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Thanks
This article is so much better than the main article on Diana. In fact, the more narrowly defined articles on WIkipedia are often far superior to what should be main articles (at least in subjects like myth and literature). Just wanted to express appreciation. Cynwolfe (talk) 16:11, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Nice article, small refs issue
Really quite minor but baffling. I've been using this article and its references as a jump off point for a rewrite of Nemoralia and I think a reference has been corrupted. It's the third in the current refs list. Vitruvius, 2.8.4. refers to building techniques, not the temple or its cult image: [1]. Regards. Haploidavey (talk) 21:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Was easily fixed. Once again, nice article. Haploidavey (talk) 21:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
PLAGIARISM
Entire paragraph taken from Frazer's "The Golden Bough" Shame on you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ApSergiu (talk • contribs) 22:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Is there a reason that you don't have to indicate that most of this entry is a direct pull from Frazer's "The Golden Bough"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mychair (talk • contribs) 07:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)