Talk:Delaware Route 1/GA1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tinton5 (talk · contribs) 20:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Review
- Well-written:
- Verifiable with no original research:
- Broad in its coverage:
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | Prose used throughout/Grammar, spelling, punctuation | ✓ Pass |
(b) (MoS) | MoS used throughout | ✓ Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (references) | References are factual and accurate | ✓ Pass |
(b) (citations to reliable sources) | Reliable sources are used throughout | ✓ Pass |
(c) (original research) | No original research | ✓ Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | Covers entirely all vital areas of the article | ✓ Pass |
(b) (focused) | Clearly written and to the point | ✓ Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
Article passes here as well | ✓ Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
No edit wars. | ✓ Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | Many, many relevant images, fair use as well | ✓ Pass |
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | Images and captions are relevant and appropriate | ✓ Pass |
Result
Result | Notes |
---|---|
✓ Pass | Very well written article, which meets GA criteria |
Final comments
This article meets GA criteria. Tinton5 (talk) 04:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)