Talk:David English (editor)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of David English (editor) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Needs more substance

He was the most innovative editor of his day, and the renaissance of the Daily Mail, as a hugely successful piece of applied psychology, deserves to be rationalised and chronicled. 86.145.152.144 (talk) 21:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Knighthood

The comment that he was about to be made a life peer will be cryptic to most people outside the UK. Presumably we mean a life peerage had been announced on dd/mm/yyyy but he died prior to investiture. We also say nothing about his knighthood, which is bizarre.

I can't see the sources but I've read enough about the guy over 40 years or so to have a gut feeling that this is a very poor article. - Sitush (talk) 23:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:David English (editor)

Needs more substance

Knighthood

Navigation menu

Search