Talk:David Bernhard

Judicial opinions

For someone who has been a judge less than 12 months, the section on his judicial opinions already appears to me to be excessively detailed and this will only get worse if the same type of editing continues. JamG, an encyclopedia article is meant to be a summary of the most notable things about a person's life, not a step by step recording of everything they do. Can you please consider summarising this more succinctly and in the future refrain from adding each new case he decides? Thanks, Melcous (talk) 22:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your helpful guidance. JamG (talk) 23:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, I would still encourage trimming it to only include mention of specifically notable decisions rather than a summary of the types of decisions. Cheers, Melcous (talk) 07:46, 27 May 2018 (UTC)