Talk:Dark shyshark/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Okay -I will make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning). I will jot questions down below Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

• ...actually I can't find much to fault it on....

• It'd be good to get a source for the map File:Haploblepharus pictus distmap.png

Done.

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

• technically ok for GA, if one were to go to FAC I think you'd be asked for a Reliable Source for the range map

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

Thanks for the review! -- Yzx (talk) 18:51, 16 December 2010 (UTC)