This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
@1292simon: re the tags you have placed on the article; could you please tell me why you believe this is written in a fan-like way, or why you don't believe Danny Gonzalez has notability? I have tried to use reliable sources for content, excluding those that can be cited as per WP:SELFPUB. Thanks! --Bangalamania (talk) 04:17, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bangalamania. Phrases such as "garnered him millions of views", "disgraced 24-year-old Musical.ly star" read like subjective statements rather than a neutral encyclopaedic tone. Regarding the notability, I am concerned that many of the sources are of routine events or not WP:RS. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 20:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Because more than half of these sources are total and utter garbage, the rest are borderline unreliable and listicles. This needs a proper AFC review, not a fly by night page move into mainspace. Praxidicae (talk) 19:26, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the review, I think listing the Bangladeshi Daily Star newspaper as an unreliable source is because of it being mistaken for the UK tabloid of the same name, which is listed over at WP:RSP. I've messaged the author to see what the justification for that is. Plus, I think that the listings of YouTube as it is now is acceptable. --Bangalamania (talk) 23:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Drmies added a cleanup template that I just removed. The template's reason read, " 'references' for singles are spam links". The references used were Apple Music links. Currently, there are no guidelines pertaining to the reliability of Apple Music. Also, how is Apple Music spam? If anyone finds any guidelines pertaining to Apple Music, reply and let me know, thanks. L33tm4n (talk) 23:40, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Apple Music is a paid service; the link is a commercial link. I don't know what "there are no guidelines" means: these are spamlinks. Binksternet, you've edited a few articles on music stuff--surely this is far beyond "referencing". And L33tm4n, when I removed all that stuff the first time and I asked "was this actually 'released'", that was a question about what "releasing" means, but really, if your only reference is to a paid service, and you have NO secondary sources, what possible reason could we have for listing it? WP:FART applies here: not everything that a notable person does is automatically noteworthy just because they did it.Chicago Rd Drmies (talk) 00:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Apple Music term "single" doesn't necessarily mean that the song was released as a single, with copies sent to radio stations, etc. You can see how it works comparing Apple's Danny Gonzalez song list with Apple's Adele song list. Danny's list has almost every song called a single, which cannot be true. Adele's list has very few songs listed as singles but not her gigantic hit singles "Someone like You" and "Hello". So you can see that Apple's "single" label is not even remotely a reliable indicator of whether a song was released as a single. The Apple references are not needed here, and with so many used incorrectly, they amount to spamming. If a single was really released, it would stand as its own reference. Same as a book or LP or DVD—they are a published item establishing at the very least that they exist. So you don't really need Apple Music to help you say that a song exists. (You might use Apple Music to establish the exact day it was released.) Binksternet (talk) 00:56, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Binksternet--I learned something. But I still wonder what "release" means these days. Back in the old days, it was easy: when the physical 45s are put on the truck to be sold at Valkenberg or Wastora. Drmies (talk) 01:19, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies and @Binksternet: Maybe, but if you have the time to read the article for Cr1TiKaL, you'll see that it uses Apple Music as a source for each The Gentle Men single. The references haven't been removed (at least yet), so it's a possibility that Apple Music can be used as a reliable source for singles, but judging by your analysis, it might be best to use Spotify as a source. L33tm4n (talk) 15:09, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think Cr1TiKaL has released any singles, either. A search for Cr1TiKaL singles comes up with nothing. Both Cr1TiKaL and Gonzalez should have their singles sections removed. Any particular songs that have been described by the media can be mentioned in prose. Binksternet (talk) 15:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Per Template:Distinguish, "The "distinguish" template produces a hatnote to point out to our readers the existence of one or more articles whose title(s) is, or are, similar to the page in question". It isn't appropriate to use it in the way you described. There's plenty of people that are often confused for each other (Amy Adams and Isla Fisher, for example), but we shouldn't tag all those articles. --Cerebral726 (talk) 14:54, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly what I was thinking. The infobox section "associated acts" is there and has Drew Gooden listed in it. It seems to be the best solution to the issue right now. ― Levi_OPTalk16:46, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 1 February 2022
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I would like to update the amount of subscribers Danny Gonzalez has. His main channel does not have 6.01 million subscribers, it has 6.04 million. His second channel (2 Danny 2 Furious) does not have 1.88 million subscribers, it has 1.92 million. His gaming channel (Danny GAMEzalez) does not have 399 thousand subscribers, it has 400 thousand. LazyNeighbours does not have 18.7 thousand subscribers, it has 18.8. TheLazyNeighbours does not have 6.73 thousand subscribers, it has 6.77 thousand. The total number of subscribers should not be 8.31 million, it should be 8.36 million.
I would also like to update the amount of views he has. His main channel does not have 1.30 billion views, it has 1.32 billion. His second channel (2 Danny 2 Furious) does not have 113.18 million views, it has 117.80 million. His gaming channel (Danny GAMEzalez) does not have 25.12 million views, it has 25.45 million. TheLazyNeighbours does not have 131.96 thousand views, it has 132.87 thousand. The total number of views should not be 1.44 billion, it should be 1.46 billion.
I would like to add nickisnotgreen (name: Nick Green) to associated acts.
I would like to take gaming out of his genre (under YouTube information) as he has stated that he will not be streaming his video games anymore. His twitch account does not have 415 thousand followers, it has 416 thousand. I-watch-too-much-youtube (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Danny Gonzalez is a YouTuber that reacts to videos and makes commentary stuff also he is the best YouTuber on the platform and he has the fastest growing army on the internet 109.242.64.246 (talk) 01:51, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Add something about Danny having a baby on the way please. Also it would be good to mention something about his subreddit and how he has a second channel. 121.75.47.201 (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]