Talk:Criticism of the Bible

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Criticism of the Bible article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Bible: Criticism Top‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the biblical criticism work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Religion Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of religion

Atheism Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

For more information and how you can help, click the [Show] link opposite:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page.

Quick help

Recent activity

To do

Join WikiProject atheism and be bold.

Add a userbox to your page ({{User WikiProject Atheism}} or {{User WPA2}}) and attract potential members.
Help with articles.
See this month's adopt-an-article.
Help out with this to-do list.

Be consistent

Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles).
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.

Maintenance, etc.

Find sources for all positions of an article (see Citing sources and atheism references).
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process).
Watch the list of atheism-related articles and add to accordingly.
Always write for an encyclopedia.

Articles to improve

Agnosticism

Create

Articles on notable atheists

Expand

an atheism stub

Immediate attention

State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here
Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes.
Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century.

Archives

Index 1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

In the authorship section there should be a mention of every undisputed author

I believe some books written by the prophets have legitimate authorship, such as Amoz and Jeremiah.Alexandre Newman (talk) 04:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles mainly act as summaries of reliable sources. Further, Wikipedia doesn't publish original research, so your interpretation of the Bible as a Wikipedia editor cannot be cited. If you know of reliable sources which discuss this as it relates to criticism of the Bible, please feel free to propose them here. Grayfell (talk) 05:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'Internal Consistency' Final Paragraph

The final paragraph under this section talks about how Ahaziah of Judah's age is inconsistent. However, there are a couple issues.

Firstly, I feel it can be written better. There are some minor grammatical errors, such as forgetting to capitalise 'Kings' in "2 Kings 8:26". As well as this, it also uses numerous colloquialisms such as "when you look at earlier manuscripts [...] , it says 20 years not 42.", instead of, for example, "earlier manuscripts [...] suggest Ahaziah's age to be 20 years old." My biggest issue is with the last sentence, which states, "Nobody can become king at 22, captured by an invading army, and 20 years later, when he is free and is king again, he is 2 years younger than the original age he became king." I feel it does not carry a neutral tone as stated in the Wikipedia policy.

Secondly, I believe it is better suited for the 'Translation issues' section. From what I found from https://www.biblestudytools.com/2-chronicles/22-2-compare.html, some translations state his age was 22, while others have written 42. Unless corrected for consistency, it is likely a translation error. Uncomfortably Underwhelmed (talk) 08:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The answer is that we don't know what the Bible originally said about that. Bible manuscripts were copied by hand, and all those manuscripts have errors, some are spelling errors, other are gross errors.

A classic example is "Abraham saw a ram behind him" vs. "Abraham saw one single ram". Theologically it is not very important, but it is an error in some manuscripts and translations. tgeorgescu (talk) 16:37, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Criticism of the Bible

In the authorship section there should be a mention of every undisputed author

'Internal Consistency' Final Paragraph

Navigation menu

Search