Talk:Crime statistics in the United Kingdom

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

references don't work

references 1 to 5 don't work, you get a 404 or a "not authorized" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.69.82.183 (talk) 09:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

Seems to confirm police corruption, rather than report accusations and concern. Green daemon (talk) 19:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which section are you referring to? All the parts about police under-reporting of crime are sourced from statements from HMIC or Tom Winsor, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary, rather than accusations from newspapers or similar. I can't see anywhere where corruption is mentioned. Perhaps you could suggest a specific edit to deal with your concerns? Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 09:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it has been cleaned up since January. Green daemon (talk) 13:09, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crime statistics in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No criming listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect No criming. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. WPCW (talk) 15:30, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edits 23rd May 2018 by user:WPCW

I want to provide a rationale for my significant edits today. (1) I have removed the 'factual inaccurate' template. My view is that the issue of the template is fixed. Additionally, the comment on that template that 'no-criming' is no longer in use is wrong, and conflicts with the article text causing confusion. (2) I have altered the lead into the article to avoid unnecessary duplication of information contained in the main text. I have also made mention of third-party reporting, such as vulnerable people reporting hate crimes to an agency for quantification, that are separate from victim services and notifiable crime police statistics. I acknowledge this will mean having to include a section about third-party reporting during the development of the article. (3) I have changed the heading 'no-criming' to 'police statistics'. The opinion is that 'no criming' is one is only one aspect of the discussion about the accuracy and validity of police crime statistics. (4) I have edited the 'no-criming' / 'police statistics' section. I have attempted to retain all of the previous material whilst adding to it, and attempted to re-write the section in the same tone as previous versions. As the earlier version, I believe it remains unbiased and based on good verifiable sources. Please let me know if you have any comments etc. Regards, WPCW (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]