Talk:Covert incest
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Covert incest article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 21 days  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Criticisms
The page really does need more criticisms of the concept, and they should be integrated throughout rather than placed in a ghetto section. I've attempted to add a link to an ezine articles page as a parity source (as most of the discussions seem to be popular books rather than scholarly press) but ran into a blacklist problem; I've placed a request to whitelist the page and in the meantime added a placeholder url. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 14:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- I see that you also made changes to the article, as seen here and here. The article is on my watchlist, but I'm not tied to (meaning invested in) the article; so I've never really considered its format. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:48, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
What is this?
Why does it sound like pseudoscience to me? User012008 (talk) 00:18, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- It is in our western-industrialized-massmedia-leaded knowledge "pseudoscience", but also as psychoanalysis, astrology, homoeopathy and others, which "works" but without a real "scientific" evidence - except of very difficult explanations such as field theory for example. Other, mostly older and more heart- and musically-leaded cultures may see those relations as obviously evident. 2003:EC:3F2A:6EA4:89D9:A376:57:4FFB (talk) 17:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)