Talk:CoverGirl

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Animal testing

I created this page and moved content here from the cover girl disambiguation page. Someone had voiced concern there over the accusation of animal testing, so I included their counter point and reference in the text. uriah923(talk) 23:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Animal testing is very large in Cover Girl Cosmetics, it is a lie that 80% has been animal tested free. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.89.10.177 (talk) 02:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality and Professional Language

I began to edit this page. I have issues with how polished the writing is and whether or not it is neutral. For example, the Awards Won by CoverGirl section does not state what magazine awarded those awards to Cover Girl, or when they did.

blatant advertising

the products and prices section? ffs!

CoverGirl has had five award winning products. The face products are the Cheekers Blush that was voted best blush five years in a row and the Outlast Liquid Makeup that was voted best foundation. For the eyes, the Fantastic Lash Mascara was voted primo lash primper. The last two products were the Outlast All Day Lipcolor that was voted best selling lipcolor and the Continuous Color Nails that had been voted to be the best beauty buy. Along with these award winning products, CoverGirl has many other products at inexpensive prices. These affordable products are available at CVS, Eckerd, K-Mart, Target, Ulta, Walgreens, and Wal Mart.

Face Foundations $2.99-$5.09 Pressed powders $4.58-$5.09 Loose powders $4.69 Concealers $3.89-$18.12 Blushes $2.99-$8.99

  • Award Winning—Cheekers Blush voted best blush 5 years in a row
  • Award Winning--Outlast Liquid Makeup voted best foundation

Eyes Eyeshadows $2.44-$3.80 Eyeliners $2.29-$2.99 Eye pencil $3.50-$3.93 Mascaras $2.99-$6.49

  • Award Winning--Fantastic Lash Mascara voted primo lash primper

Lips Lipsticks $2.79-$6.29 Lipgloss $3.50-$5.49 Lipliner $2.69-$5.89

  • Best Selling Lipcolor—Outlast All Day Lipcolor

Nails Nail polish $2.80-$3.39

  • Award Winning—Continuous Color Nails voted best beauty buy

Tools

Eyes Eyelash curler $3.99 Shadow applicator $2.99 3-in-1 sharpeners $2.89 Clean makeup remover $3.89

Face Sponge wedges $2.99 Powder puffs $1.99 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cannibalicious! (talkcontribs) 06:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

OFF!...

Who ever is putting "HI this is Miguel and Rauel...we love putting on makeup" please stop writing that comment, we do NOT need to know that,if you do its vandalism!(Trampton 06:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

--207.63.51.53 (talk) 19:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Kacey[reply]


Christie Brinkley

I removed the comment by 72.54.150.182. It was a ridiculous level of advertising for any site, let alone an encyclopedia article.

Re: the article: it states Christie Brinkley was the first face of Cover Girl. This may not be true, depending on your definition of "face of Cover Girl". Both Cybill Sheperd and Cheryl Tiegs had long-term contracts with Cover Girl that preceded Christie Brinkley's, and their commercials are readily available on YouTube. Is the author suggesting Christie was the first model, the first long-term model, or the first exclusive model (meaning her contract excluded any other advertising work) for Cover Girl? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.196.195 (talkcontribs) 20:58, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed: "The company diversified its product line, and Brinkley's 20-year contract with CoverGirl was the longest in the history of the modeling industry.[1]." Brinkley's 20-year contract cannot be longer than the easily verified 30 years that Jennifer O'Neill was a Cover Girl. Mention of Brinkley's 20-year relationship with the company remains in the Celebrities section.

I removed: (Christie Brinkley) "was the first model for CoverGirl[citation needed], and" since this is disproved a number of times in this article, and I just added another.

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on CoverGirl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CoverGirl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 October 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 05:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


CoverGirlCovergirl – This is a stylization issue, as I feel that it is one word and the "G" does not need to be capitalized. JE98 (talk) 01:50, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - "Covergirl" is better off in its current place, per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, as an alternate spelling of cover girl. The brand is quite clearly based on the concept, rather than the other way around.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 09:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The clear primary topic is cover girl, which is what covergirl should really redirect to. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – leave covergirl redirecting to the disambig page. Dicklyon (talk) 04:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose to distinguish the brand from the general concept. bd2412 T 14:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.