Talk:Cormack Foundation

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Australia: Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Cormack Foundation is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

RS?

"established for the purpose of raising funds " The source doesn't make this statement. Should it be reworded to something more neutral? Shot info 02:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shot Info. Added reference which says "It exists to raise funds...". Let me know if you require more references for verification, and I will add them if necessary. Cheers, --Lester2 05:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better, but there is a little bit of OR occuring to link the two sentences together. Nevertheless, will let it stand as it is minor in the context of the overall article. Thanks. Shot info 00:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Cormack Foundation

RS?

Navigation menu

Search