Talk:Christmas jumper

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Christmas jumper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

worldwide view

https://www.cnn.com/style/article/ugly-christmas-jumpers/index.html doing that thing where I don't wanna improve the article myself but here's a link showing they started earlier in the us Impasse (talk) 14:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No Consensus to Move as requested. However a more focused discussion on Christmas jumper v. Christmas sweater may be warranted. Mike Cline (talk) 12:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Christmas jumperUgly Christmas sweater – I think this is the more common title. Additionally, Per MOS:COMMONALITY, we should use universally accepted terms rather than those less widely distributed, especially in titles. As "sweater" is used in both British and American English, while "jumper" is only used in British English, the title that is just as easily recognized across both major varieties of English is superior to the title easily recognized in only one of the two major varieties. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:27, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of sources used for this article refer to this item as a “Christmas Jumper” so I don’t see the need for this move and am especially against the insertion of “ugly”. Vladimir.copic (talk) 06:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.