Talk:Chocolat
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | Disambiguation | |||
| ||||
Requested move
- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved per clear consensus here. --regentspark (comment) 21:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
– The novel has less views than the film. In fact, as a French term, "Chocolat" is ambiguous... not exactly, but I don't always associate it as the novel. I'm sure the readers would go for either the film or the Wiktionary. George Ho (talk) 20:15, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- Redirect "Chocolat" to Chocolate as an {{R from mispelling}}, dropping the final letter, and rename the novel. -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 04:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- What? Chocolat is a title for a novel and film. Also, it's French for "chocolate". --George Ho (talk) 05:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- It's also an English-language misspelling of "chocolate". -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 05:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- What are you trying to do? Force people to believe that "chocolat" is wrong? --George Ho (talk) 05:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Huh? There would be a hatnote saying at chocolate if my suggestion is implemented. -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 06:09, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Read this: Even "Chocolat" is legitimate as an official title for both novel and film. Readers will learn about the history of this word. Even an inept person may realize it for seconds. For example, The End of the Innocence and End of Innocence. Roseanna and Roseanne. Also, why do you oppose "Chocolat" as a title for a novel or film? --George Ho (talk) 06:16, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- It's a highly likely typo for chocolate, so your "read this" link applies to my reasoning, primary topic due to common misspelling. -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 06:25, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Highly unlikely that an administrator will do your biddings by ignoring how sources use "Chocolat" as a proper noun and "chocolat" as a word. --George Ho (talk) 06:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- It's a highly likely typo for chocolate, so your "read this" link applies to my reasoning, primary topic due to common misspelling. -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 06:25, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Read this: Even "Chocolat" is legitimate as an official title for both novel and film. Readers will learn about the history of this word. Even an inept person may realize it for seconds. For example, The End of the Innocence and End of Innocence. Roseanna and Roseanne. Also, why do you oppose "Chocolat" as a title for a novel or film? --George Ho (talk) 06:16, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Huh? There would be a hatnote saying at chocolate if my suggestion is implemented. -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 06:09, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- What are you trying to do? Force people to believe that "chocolat" is wrong? --George Ho (talk) 05:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- It's also an English-language misspelling of "chocolate". -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 05:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- What? Chocolat is a title for a novel and film. Also, it's French for "chocolate". --George Ho (talk) 05:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support - the film and novel are of similar importance, a dab page is the simplest solution. A misspelling redirect is less important, to put it bluntly. Interplanet Janet, Esquire IANAL 08:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Too generic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:07, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support If anything should be the primary topic, it's probably the film. The request as is should work. --BDD (talk) 17:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge with Chocolate (disambigation)
No sense to have two separate pages, listing "Chocolate" and "Chocolat" usages. Both can be listed on one page. Example: Guadalupe and many others. Dims (talk) 13:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC)