Talk:Child labour in Nepal

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lramkelawan97. Peer reviewers: Sshah11, Jk956.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Child labour in Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Child labour in Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Plans to update this page

I plan on citing more of the information on this page and adding more information about the social effects of child labor in Nepal. The references I will be using and my ideas are listed on my user page. Lramkelawan97 (talk) 23:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)lramkelawan97[reply]

Plans

I plan on removing the uncited information on this page and validating the cited information. I will be adding sections on the causes of child labor in Nepal, other industries that the children work in, and other solutions to this issue. There is more information on my sandbox. Lramkelawan97 (talk) 00:51, 3 October 2017 (UTC)lramkelawan97[reply]

Adding causes section

I will be adding sections about the causes of child labour, please see my sandbox for sources. Lramkelawan97 (talk) 04:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)lramkelawan97[reply]

Peer Review

This article has been developed well to add additional information about the different types of child labor, and the responses and solutions to this problem in Nepal. The author has done a great job in using reliable, scholarly articles that substantiate every fact written. The author also does not have any bias or articles that would sway the reader in a particular direction when reading the article. It is solely comprised of facts and statistics. To improve this article, the author can improve upon the lead section to add more links to other pages and be more clear about the topic. In addition, the author should develop the latter half of the article, which discusses solutions/responses to child labour. Another point of improvement would be to discuss the studies used in the article more, for example discussing the population size, and historical context of the study. Another addition that the author could have in this article is how and if the child labour system has changed throughout history. This is not a necessary change, simply one that might add to the article.Sshah11 (talk) 01:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Overall, your article is informative, easy to understand, and relevant! You did a great job in gathering information from various sources and laying out the information in an accessible and easy-to-understand way. Your tone is unbiased and you succeed in keeping a neutral tone throughout the article. My main suggestion would be to expand on the last two sections (impact, solutions). I feel that these are very relevant topics and that adding more information to supplement what you already have would be great. Readers and I would be interested in learning about other impacts of child labour in Nepal and other potential solutions. Furthermore, another suggestion I have is to add more links to and from your article (PTSD, social labeling). Finally, consider making your lead section more inclusive of the topics in the article by summarizing the main points of each section. Jk956 (talk) 02:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]