Talk:Cerro Azul (Chile volcano)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 17:17, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Initial comments

A fairly short article that appears to be well-referenced and fairly comprehensive in scope. I will now start the indepth review. Pyrotec (talk) 07:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

• Geography and geology -

• Appears to be compliant.

• Eruptive history -

• Appears to be compliant in respect of WP:verify.
• The Smithsonian ref in the bibliography mentions that the last activity was in 1967 (and its also in the Info box); but it is not mentioned in this section of the article.

Yes it is, see the eruptive history paragraph.

Sorry, I've read that paragraph at least three times and I did not see it until now. Pyrotec (talk) 18:36, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

• WP:Lead -

• Possibly a bit on the short side, but for an article of this length it is reasonably. I would suggest a brief comment that it last erupted in 1967.

Done.

Pyrotec (talk) 14:45, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article: I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 18:39, 28 September 2009 (UTC)