Talk:Centre-right politics
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Centre-right politics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 years  |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 November 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-NPOV
(Under the heading "Fiscal Centrists and Social Conservatives of the Centre-Right"): "They are thus opposed to both militant communism and reactionary free-market Thatcherism"
This is a non-NPOV statement, as it implies that Communism is "militant" and that "Thatcherism" is "reactionary." I changed it to "They are thus opposed to both what they see as militant communism and also reactionary free-market Thatcherism" for now. I also changed the value judgment "occupying somewhat of a middle ground in economic policy." to the statement of fact "occupying a middle ground between those two ideologies in economic policy." Wormyguy (talk) 01:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps a neutral way of saying it is just opposed to socialism and very limited regulated capitalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.240.255.227 (talk) 07:46, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Tacking onto the non-NPOV thread. I have removed the use of the term bourgeoises from the introduction as it is a term used almost exclusively in Marxian sociology. There is no need to use this term when a neutral term, upper class, exists instead. Further, if you actually click through the link that was there, it takes you to a page with a huge "part of a series on Marxism" banner on the side. Very clearly not NPOV. --Cthulhuclub (talk) 00:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)