Talk:Centaurea solstitialis

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ntayl23.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be titled by its scientific name, not by one of its common names. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (flora). KP Botany 21:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Description needed

A physical description of the plant and its flowers is needed. The article currently deals almost entirely with its weed aspects, but lacks a description of its size, color, etc. — QuicksilverT @ 00:34, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have included an elementary but sufficient description of the species. Daniel 26 Nov. 2013.

Worldview view

I have included some initial comments giving the article a more global perspective at a world level but more work on this is needed. Daniel 26 Nov. 2013.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Centaurea solstitialis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Hello,

To help improve the article I made a few contributions, including information, hyperlinks, and citations. I also corrected an entire section of plagiarism under "Integrated methods". any feedback is appreciated Ntayl23 (talk) 04:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]