The contents of the Comics artist page were merged into Cartoonist on 22 October 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles
This article was selected as the article for improvement on 22 April 2013 for a period of one week.
This article was selected as the article for improvement on 29 August 2022 for a period of one week.
First cartoonist
Historically, is there consensus that the first cartoonist (in terms of use of the word) was John Leech? --BozMotalk 11:21, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comic strip in caption
Copy the image, blow it up, and you'll see that it's Mark Trail (though whether that's the strip's cartoonist, Ed Dodd, I cannot tell). Interestingly, this PD U.S.-government image comes from the US Fish and Wildlife Service; the character Mark Trail has appeared in a number of children's educational publications by that agency. — Tenebrae 20:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
external links...
Is the link to an "example of freelance cartoonist website" really adequate? Is not it just a sort of free advertisement, opening precedent to using wikipedia as if it was a telephonic list, i.e, adding things like "another freelance cartoonist website", "yet another", and links to pharmacies in medicine related articles, etc? I think that if the reader wants to look for a generic freelance cartoonist website or whatever, he can easily use an search engine, without needing a link to a specific site.--Extremophile 23:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I removed it, and added a few more links, mainly to other national cartoonist societies, although also one or two resources for scholars too. HidingTalk 13:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think the link to StickDeath.com in the main article is an advertisement. But as am not sure I didn't mess with it. Somebody please do the needful.
Kalhans 2nd april 2007
There was a request for merging since December 2006, so I merged Comic Strip Creator into this page, adding about 2 paragraphs of information. --Jackson 01:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Manga where?
From a western viewpoint, manga is a form or cartoon (comic) just as anime is a form of animation (from a western viewpoint). But this article doesn't mention manga at all, only mangaka at the "see also" section. I know this article is about the western type of cartoons/comics and their artists, but since japanese comics are indeed comics, they should be mentioned here. They even have the counterpart of the traditional single comic strips (like Garfield) of newspapers: 4koma or "four panel" gag comics (like Lucky Star). --Rev L. Snowfox (talk) 12:38, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cartoonist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 2 external links on Cartoonist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Leading Section: seems clear and without any missing information. There aren't any sources in the leading section. The third paragraph also includes no source information.
West History: Needs more information added to describe context.
Comics: Needs much more information added to the descriptions.
Creation: Makes claims without sources, seems anecdotal in nature, and sparse.
Types of animation: needs sources
Tools: Needs sources
Tone of entire article is not an informational tone. The sourcing and information give the article a western bias, comprimising neutrality.
The sources are not always reliable, and some are out of orders. Update the links, relies too heavily on blogs, from one area, and lacks variety in the areas of interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tagropp (talk • contribs) 19:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that there needs to be more references in this article. The sources that are used are questionable in reliability. Most are websites, the one book referenced has a link but you must purchase to check the source. The 2 sections you mentioned Creation and Types of Animation have no sources and the bulk of the history section is lacking citations. The British Museum link is dead and although the lead section mentions many types of cartoonist the article over represents comics and animation with no sections or information on other types of cartoonist. I think this article needs more information on other cartoonist and better sources for the information present. Earth sunshine goddess (talk) 18:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Cartoonist suggestions
The page Cartoonist displays sufficient material content in the lead section, the only suggestion I can add to this is that it could be broken into more sentences rather than the really long last sentence with multiple commas. It seems to be balanced well and has the appropriate header style running through it. The article has images that relate to the material in it, and the links work well. The coverage is neutrally based and the reference list looks to be reliable. Overall it seems to be a well written article other than a few long sentences that could be broken down into shorter ones. --Lchollingsworth (talk) 18:33, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
TOOLS Topic The 16 essential tools for artists reference link is for a Blog which is not an academic or scholarly source. It could be just a reference for a picture, although the information under Tools doesn't seem to have any source for the information under this topic.Trucksurgeon (talk) 18:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Edits to page
Overall the page is very well written, the hyperlinks all work and highlight important mentions throughout the page. The page is well formatted and structured. The only issues are that the "Tools" header should also feature the line under it like the other titles. Also the "In the West" subsection should be followed by information from outside the West to complete the history section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajaniskt (talk • contribs) 20:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Fixes Within Page
1) Under History section, there doesn't need to be a "West" subsection because there is no other region involved.
2) Works Cited page should be combined with the Reference Page
3) In the sections "Types of animation" and "Art styles" capitalize the second/third word.
4) Tools needs the heading format
5) Move the further reading either to the article or reference page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.206.191.68 (talk) 20:22, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
I'm disappointed that no one replied at the time, but these comments are appreciated. I agree that the article is very uneven and inconsistent, and I've started doing some work on it. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 00:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
These two articles are essentially the same topic. I've suggested that comics artist be merged into cartoonist, because not all cartoonists draw comics, but all artists who make comics are cartoonists. While some comics artists might bristle at that term (not a fan of it myself), that's the occupational term that's widely used, and the style of the art doesn't make it a different occupation. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 20:59, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Any input on this? These two terms are synonyms, and having two articles taking different angles on the same topic is redundant. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 12:58, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The key may be two different angles, and the differences between the two topics may be enough to keep them seperate. Haven't looked at the two pages closely enough, but both seem to have good material, and the key to a merge is for all the pertinent material to survive. Can this be done here without diluting data? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please see this edit that clarifies things up. This editor's addition is backed up by at least one source which I've just added to the relevant section. --Omnipaedista (talk) 16:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Within the comic strip format, it is typical for one creator to produce the whole strip. However, it is also not uncommon for the writing of the strip and the drawing of the art to be carried out by two different people, a writer and an artist (with or without additional assistant artists). In some cases, one artist might draw key figures while another does only backgrounds.[citation needed]
Books of cartoons are available in both paperback and hardcover, such as the collections of cartoons from The New Yorker. Prior to the 1960s, cartoons were mostly ignored by museums and art galleries. In 1968, the cartoonist and comedian Roger Price opened the first New York City gallery devoted exclusively to cartoons, mainly work by the leading magazine gag cartoonists. Today, there are several museums devoted to cartoons, notably the Billy Ireland Cartoon Library & Museum, run by curator Jenny E. Robb at Ohio State University.[citation needed]
With regards to the comic book format, the work can be split in many different ways. The writing and the creation of the art can be split between two people, an example being From Hell, which was written by Alan Moore and drawn by Eddie Campbell. The writing of a comic book story can sometimes be shared between two people, with one person writing the plot and another the script.[citation needed]
The artistic work is often subdivided, especially on work produced for the larger comic book publishers, with four people typically working on the art: a penciller, an inker, a colorist, and a letterer. Sometimes this combination of four artists is augmented by a fifth, a breakdown artist. However, this generally occurs only when an artist fails to meet a deadline or when a writer, sometimes referred to as a scripter, produces breakdown art. Breakdown art is where the story has been laid out very roughly in pencils to indicate panel layouts and character positions within panels but with no details. Such roughs are sometimes referred to as "layouts."[citation needed]
The norm of four artists is sometimes reduced to three if the penciller also inks his own work, usually being credited within the book as a penciller/inker. John Byrne and Walt Simonson are artists who have, on occasion, inked their own work.[citation needed]
These roles are highly interchangeable, and many artists can fulfill different roles. Stan Sakai is a highly regarded letterer of comic books who also creates his own series, Usagi Yojimbo. Producing his autobiographical works, Eddie Campbell has created both scripts and art, plus teaming with his daughter on the coloring. On Cerebus, for the majority of the run, Dave Sim created everything except the backgrounds, which were drawn by Gerhard.[citation needed]
Web cartoonist
Many artists have used the web since its inception to publish their works online. This eventually led to the creation of webcomics thanks in part to many titles being able to be read for free and anyone being able to publish them. Many of the artists who create these webcomics are known as web cartoonists due to the fact that the vast majority of webcomics are considered to be online versions of comic-strips and cartoons rather than full-fledged comic books like digital comics. It is hard to pinpoint when the actual term was created but the earliest use was 2001 with the Web Cartoonists' Choice Awards. Some well known web cartoonists include Randall Munroe of xkcd, Jeph Jacques of Questionable Content and Jerry Holkins and Mike Krahulik of Penny Arcade.[citation needed]
Creation
Comics artists usually sketch a drawing in pencil before going over the drawing in India ink, using either a dip pen or a brush. Artists may also use a lightbox to create the final image in ink. Some artists, Brian Bolland, for example, use computer graphics, with the published work as the first physical appearance of the artwork. By many definitions (including McCloud's, above), the definition of comics extends to digital media such as webcomics and the mobile comic.[citation needed]
The nature of the comics work being created determines the number of people who work on its creation, with successful comic strips and comic books being produced through a studio system, in which an artist assembles a team of assistants to help create the work. However, works from independent companies, self-publishers, or those of a more personal nature can be produced by a single creator.[citation needed]
Within the comic book industry of North America, the studio system has come to be the main method of creation. Through its use by the industry, the roles have become heavily codified, and the managing of the studio has become the company's responsibility, with an editor discharging the management duties. The editor assembles a number of creators and oversees the work to publication.[citation needed]
In contrast, a comic strip tends to be the work of a sole creator, usually termed a cartoonist. However, it is not unusual for a cartoonist to employ the studio method, particularly when a strip becomes successful. Mort Walker employed a studio, while Bill Watterson and Charles Schulz did not. Gag, political, and editorial cartoonists tend to work alone as well, though a cartoonist may use assistants.[citation needed]
Eraser, rulers, templates, set squares and a T-square assist in creating lines and shapes. A drawing table provides an angled work surface with lamps sometimes attached to the table. A lightbox allows an artist to trace his pencil work when inking, allowing for a looser finish. Knives and scalpels fill a variety of needs, including cutting board or scraping off mistakes. A cutting mat aids paper trimming. Process white is a thick opaque white material for covering mistakes. Adhesives and tapes help composite an image from different sources.[citation needed]
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
