Talk:Cambridge University Press v. Patton

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

University of Cambridge

This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge Wikiproject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

2012 categories

Since this case has not yet been decided (although summary judgment was granted on vicarious and direct liability), I do not think it belongs in the case law categories or the copyright case law list. PacificWonderland (talk) 20:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

seal

Consider adding this seal to the infobox as it is in the public domain (U.S. federal government produced): https://ecf.gand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/ShowIndex.pl Boaltie (talk) 19:34, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

tense

There are some lingering tense issues that the case goes from present to past tense.Boaltie (talk) 19:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

references

I think the amended complaint/answer are more useful as references. I recommend removing the original complaint/answer entirely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boaltie (talk • contribs) 20:09, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/copyright/article/71357-publishers-appeal-gsu-copyright-case.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.186.16.120 (talk) 04:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Statutory Interpretation Editorial Language in Last Sentence of Article

I'm removing the sentence "This statement defies the logic of the law, because the fact is that fair use has been a part of the actual statute since the Copyright Act of 1976"

Please see Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. The Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539, 549 (1985). Not only is this sentence poorly worded, it accuses the concurring judge of exactly what it is guilty. Further, it is merely editorial without a source. Judge Vinson is correct in stating "fair use analysis does not require conventional statutory interpretation," because fair use is a common law doctrine and "Congress meant 'to restate the present judicial doctrine of fair use, not to change, narrow, or enlarge it in any way' and intended that courts continue the common-law tradition of fair use adjudication." Id. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RCPiercy (talk • contribs) 11:50, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cambridge University Press v. Patton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101010003213/http://www.libraryjournal.com/lj/community/academiclibraries/887124-419/georgia_state_ereserves_case_narrowed.html.csp to http://www.libraryjournal.com/lj/community/academiclibraries/887124-419/georgia_state_ereserves_case_narrowed.html.csp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Cyberlaw and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]