Talk:Boys Like You (Who Is Fancy song)/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 12:44, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Coming later today --Kyle Peake (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

  • The studio should be cited in the parameter for it instead
  • WP:OVERLINK of Who Is Fancy in the infobox
  • "is a song recorded by American singer" → "is a song by American singer"
  • "Fancy co-wrote it with Jonathan Rotem," → "Fancy co-wrote it with J.R. Rotem,"
  • "with production from J.R. Rotem." → "while the former of the three handled production."
  • "released it as a single" → "released the song for digital download and streaming as a single" with the appropriate targets
  • "and lyrics about Fancy," → "and lyrics about Who Is Fancy,"
  • Mention the critical reception as the first sentence of the second para instead, giving that the song's title to begin the sentence though
  • "and number 26 in New Zealand," → "and number 26 on the New Zealand Singles Chart," with the target
  • Gold should not be capitalised and the target should solely be on that word instead
  • "was released a day prior to it" → "was released a day prior to the single release, featuring the trio in animation"
  • "The trio performed it" → "Who Is Fancy, Trainor and Grande performed it"
  • Add what year the performed it on the show

Background and release

  • "Jake Hagood met Meghan Trainor in Nashville" → "Jake Hagood met Trainor in Nashville" with the target
  • Target single to Single (music)
  • "Hagood wrote" → "He wrote"
  • "with Jonathan Rotem, Jason Gantt" → "with J.R. Rotem, Jason Gantt"
  • "with production from J.R. Rotem." → "with production being solely handled by Rotem."
  • "He recorded the song" → "Who Is Fancy recorded the song"
  • "with Trainor and Ariana Grande." → "with Trainor and Grande."
  • "because of Fancy's enthusiastic" → "because of Who Is Fancy's enthusiastic"
  • "during its recording." → "during the recording."
  • "Fancy announced "Boys Like You" as" → "Who Is Fancy announced "Boys Like You" as"
  • "which she also confirmed on her" → "which she subsequently confirmed on her"
  • "he announced Trainor's role as a feature" → "he announced Trainor to be featured"
  • "On November 12, Grande unveiled its artwork" → "On November 12, 2015, Grande unveiled the song's artwork"
  • Order of formats and single statement is wrong way around
  • "on November 23" → "on November 23 of that year"
  • "in the United States" → "stations in the United States"

Composition

  • Retitle to Composition and lyrics
  • "of "Boys Like You"'s chorus," → "of the chorus of "Boys Like You"," on the audio sample text
  • Sure you can't add some info about the chorus itself on the sample?
  • Wikilink doo-wop to itself and target pop to Pop music
  • "with lyrics about Fancy" → "with lyrics discussing Who Is Fancy" to avoid repetitive wording
  • "describing it as a" → "describing the track as a"
  • "charm" in which she delivers" → "charm" that sees her deliver"
  • Wikilink staccato to itself
  • "Grande's verse which includes" → "Grande's verse, which includes"
  • "The same website's Jessica Norton described" → "Also for MTV News, Jessica Norton described"
  • "and Mike Wass called it" → "and the website's Mike Wass called the song"

Reception

  • "received mixed reviews from music critics." → "was met with mixed to positive reviews from music critics." with the target
  • "jokingly remarked that it" → "jokingly remarked that the song"
  • "ranking of Grande's discography," → "ranking of Grande's songs,"
  • Italicise Vulture and target to Vulture.com per MOS:LINK2SECT
  • "where it debuted at number 34 and peaked" → "debuting at number 34 and peaking"
  • "certified Gold in the country" → "certified gold by Recorded Music NZ (RMNZ) for selling 7,500 units in the country" with the target
  • "also reached number 18 on the US" → "further reached number 18 on the US Billboard"
  • [19] can be at the end of the sentence since four refs is fine
  • "and numbers 47 and 89 on the" → "and number 47 and 89 on the"

Promotion

  • "of Fancy, Trainor and Grande." → "of Who Is Fancy, Trainor and Grande."
  • "and flirt with them" → "while flirting with them"
  • Target 21st season to Dancing with the Stars (American season 21)
  • "in which Fancy wore" → "for which Who Is Fancy wore"
  • "Trainor and then Grande." → "Trainor, and then Grande."
  • "reported that Fancy's choreographer" → "reported that Who Is Fancy's choreographer"

Credits and personnel

  • Why is there no source(s)?
  • Remove wikilink on piano
  • Target engineering to Audio engineer

Charts

  • Good

Certifications

  • Switch the certtable so shipments figures is not listed at the bottom, since it is totally irrelevant to the article

Release history

  • Good

References

  • Nice job on the archiving!
  • Copyvio score looks great at 23.1%
  • Ref 1 is missing a space after Trainor,
  • Ref 5 should cite numerous countries to verify the release was various and add distributors in brackets; (US), for example
  • Is it fine to just change it to Google Play? Which I think has one link that works in every country.
  • Cite Vulture as work/website instead for ref 15 and target to Vulture.com
  • Ref 19 and 22 are missing accessdates

Final comments and verdict

  • Yup, Google Play is considered reliable and I've replaced iTunes with it already. The only thing confusing for me was the suggestion that Jonathan Rotem's birth name shouldn't be used, but I removed it anyway. Cheers.--NØ 02:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]