Talk:Boys' Ranch/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Well written, I made one minor copy-edit, follows the MoS adequately

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All online references check out. I asume good faith for off line sourcing. Sources appear to be reliable.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The article is broad enough and focussed. I can't think of much more that could be said.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   the licensing tag on File:Simonkirbyphoto.jpg is incorrect. It is not a "non-free comic" it is a photo of the authors, although it appeared in a comic book reprint. I have changed it to {{Non-free historic image}}, which I think is more accurate and hopefully correct

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

OK, good to go. I am happy to awrad this article GA status. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanky kindly fer some mighty fine evaluatin' pawd'nuh - me and the the boys' is much oblidged! --Scott Free (talk) 16:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for doing the assessment and well done everyone who worked on the article!! (Emperor (talk) 03:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC))