This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Territories of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject United States TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject United States TerritoriesUnited States Territories articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
The picture of the man with the giant sword is a Brunei warrior not a visayan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.147.20.110 (talk) 10:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Provenance
This section seems lacking. I found an article describing the possible provenance of the manuscript, its account of the voyage of Miguel Roxo de Brito, the timeline when it was brought to Spain from the Philippines, possibly by Hernando de los Ríos Coronel, and some evidence from the binding (its well-preserved condition, use of sheep leather binding, Boxer himself noting that the binding "is of a familiar late sixteenth/early seventeenth century Iberian type" that suggests that the manuscript was taken to Spain and bound in Spain early, at least 1614. Here is the article: John N. Crossley - The Early History of the Boxer Codex Or would this be considered not established info yet and so not fit to be included in the wiki? Quidquidlatetadparebit (talk) 18:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}