Talk:Bound variable pronoun
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bound variable pronoun article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall 2014. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of British Columbia/Linguistics (Fall 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
New Info: Bound Variable Pros & Semantics of Number agreement
I will be adding information from Hotze Rullman's paper "Bound-Variable Pronouns and the Semantics of Number" — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimiSanni (talk • contribs) 03:02, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- I have
- changed some of the formatting to comply with the Manual of Style (e.g. no curly or slanted quotes). Some still needs to be changed (e.g. subscript indices)
- fixed some spelling
- The following statement needs some clarification, at least, to make it clearer whether it is in Wikipedia's voice or that of Rullmann in 2003.
- "However, sentences like the following are considered ungrammatical: "
- See, for instance,
- --Boson (talk) 20:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
SimiSanni (talk) 01:18, 9 December 2017 (UTC) : Thank you for your comments, I will start to edit all of that which you have mentioned. Also, I have put a full citation of the paper at the bottom of the wiki page.