Talk:Bisacodyl

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

mechanism?

mechanism? Tkjazzer (talk) 06:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

function within the body 195.241.100.249 (talk) 02:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Side effects / safety

Missing: As I write this, the words "side effects," "safety," "safe," "over-the-counter," and/or "over the counter" do not appear anywhere in the article. In the United States, it is sold over the counter cheaply at Walmart, for example, 88 cents a bottle, so it must be relatively safe? 5Q5 (talk) 14:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@5Q5 2600:1700:9BE0:49F0:3574:BB70:6505:749A (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bisacodyl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Historical aboratificant?

I'm reading a book set in the early 1900s and the protagonist takes something called a "liver pill" when she finds out she's pregnant. It doesn't end up being effective. Since "liver pill" redirects here, I was wondering if anyone knows if this substance had any historical use as an abortificant. Clovermoss (talk) 01:50, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant for making poo

Took one and had the poop of the century 46.30.183.180 (talk) 22:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]