(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2] and
References properly arranged. Date format not perfectly consistent (would need fixing for FA status).
Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)
Several Citations needed. Now supplied.
Pass
(c) (original research)
Generally fine but see (b) (citations).
Pass
Broad in its coverage:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (major aspects)
Wide range of topics covered.
Pass
(b) (focused)
Each section is concise and relevant.
Pass
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
Generally maintains good NPOV; good balance between sections.
Pass
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
Quite intensive editing this year, with some POV additions not amounting to disputes.
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
Good coverage with images. All images from Commons except Implanon implant which had doubtful claim to PD: image removed
Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)
All images are relevant, suitably captioned.
Pass
Result
Result
Notes
Pass
Actions completed
Discussion
Please add any related discussion here.
Additional Notes
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.