Talk:Bigipedia

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleBigipedia has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 9, 2009Good article nomineeListed
November 19, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
December 4, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
December 15, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 2, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Matt Kirshen's Bigipedia article on the "Bee Whisperer" was inspired by an article found using the random article function on Wikipedia?
Current status: Good article

Random article link

Per WP:SELFREF, should the text "'random article'" not link externally to the Special:Random function?  Skomorokh  18:36, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, do you think I should remove the link altogether? ISD (talk) 18:49, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it should not be wikilinked, but following the rule of thumb of "would we link to this if it were a page on another website", I think it ought be externally linked here as 'random article'. Cheers,  Skomorokh  18:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, cheers. ISD (talk) 19:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bigipedia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman 18:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much my only main concern (rather major) is that the reception section is basically just a bunch of quotes in their own paragraphs. Like ideas could probably be combined into their own paragraph(s), and it would be better served not just being a list of quotes about the show. I'll put this on hold and pass when the section is modified. Wizardman 18:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to improve the section like you asked. ISD (talk) 21:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The information in the quotes that were removed I would like to see added in, though perhaps not in blockquote form, and maybe just a small part of the quote itself. It's better like this than before, but maybe not perfect. Granted, I'll still pass the article as a GA; just tweak the removed quotes to how you think they'd be best shown with the information given. Wizardman 05:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bigipedia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]