Talk:Biff Tannen

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Fair use rationale for Image:Biff 2015.JPG

Image:Biff 2015.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Biff 1985.JPG

Image:Biff 1985.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Biff 1985-A.JPG

Image:Biff 1985-A.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Biff 1955.JPG

Image:Biff 1955.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Snopes link appears to have changed

Regarding Bob Gale's claim that the Biff character was based on Trump, @Howicus: added a link to Snopes which cast doubt on that claim (diff).

However, the Snopes link does not show the claimed content. All Snopes says about Trump on that page is:

CLAIM: Multiple social media rumors circulated on Back to the Future Day (21 October 2015): that Michael J. Fox was arrested for "insider sports betting," that Nike delivered a pair of self-tying sneakers, and that the Biff Tannen character was based on Donald Trump.

... and Snopes never follows through and addresses the Trump claim.

Snopes even did a Facebook entry on it: Was Back to the Future Trilogy's Biff really based on Donald J. Trump? ... but again, although they raised that claim, they don't address it.

I suspect Snopes has removed their original refutation of the claim, but left the claim in their article. One other source also indicates that Snopes had previously addressed the claim... probably unreliable, but interesting in that it cites Snopes refutation (http://tubitv.com/blog/2016/05/03/ted-cruz-likens-donald-trump-to-back-to-the-future-villain/ which says, "though according to snopes.com, the Biff backstory that Cruz describes might not be completely true") I also found one forum entry which is in no way reliable but which also talks about Snopes casting doubts on the issue.

archive.org does not archive Snopes. Neither does Google. And for whatever reason, the refutation of the claim not on Snopes. I'm removing it. Marteau (talk) 18:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that Snopes has changed doesn't mean that the statement is no longer true. A quick search provided a more reliable source: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/10/21/how-back-to-the-future-predicted-trump.html. Because of that, I would restore the statement but replace the link of the source. -- Lyverbe (talk) 22:04, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I removed this:
"The website Snopes.com noted that Gale has not made this claim before, and suggested that the claim may have been created to fit current events."
Nothing in the source you provided supports any of that. Marteau (talk) 22:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bit of a pity, as the Snopes article did at one time talk about the Trump claim, but if the source is changed and unrecoverable, removing it is understandable. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 03:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Snopes link

In the talk section immediately above, I discussed removing Snopes coverage of the Tannen/Trump linkage. I mentioned that the material our article referenced did not appear in the article.

That material does in fact appear in the article. It is on page 3. I am not sure if I simply neglected to check for other pages, or if it was restored, but the text I removed is in fact properly sourced, and I'm going to go ahead and restore the material I removed, exactly as it was. Marteau (talk) 20:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biff Tannen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline intellectual functioning

It might be a coincidence, but BIF is an abbreviation for borderline intellectual functioning (below average cognitive ability)
Alquantor (talk) 02:17, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]