Talk:Belarusians

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Category: People from Belarus

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Belarusians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is currently being proposed that Category:Slavic countries and territories be deleted. This article is related to that category. The relevant discussion is located at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 January 8#Countries and territories by language family. The discussion would benefit from input from editors with a knowledge of and interest in Belarusians. Krakkos (talk) 11:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transliteration of proper Belarusian texts

5.197.251.205, I would like to clarify the transliteration system you are using. The transliteration system you are using is used solely for narrowly targeted purposes. In particular, exclusively for the transfer of geographic Belarusian names located in Belarus.--Modun (talk) 02:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC) [http://gki.gov.by/uploads/files/new%20structure/napravleniya/geodezia%20i%20kartografia/39_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%20%D0%93%D0%9A%D0%98_23.10.2000_%E2%84%96%2015.doc ПОСТАНОВЛЕНИЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО КОМИТЕТА ПО ЗЕМЕЛЬНЫМ РЕСУРСАМ, ГЕОДЕЗИИ И КАРТОГРАФИИ РЕСПУБЛИКИ БЕЛАРУСЬ от 23 ноября 2000 г. № 15 "ОБ УТВЕРЖДЕНИИ ИНСТРУКЦИИ ПО ТРАНСЛИТЕРАЦИИ ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКИХ НАЗВАНИЙ РЕСПУБЛИКИ БЕЛАРУСЬ БУКВАМИ ЛАТИНСКОГО АЛФАВИТА"][reply]

I have explained countless times none of the systems of romanization of Belarusian use ł. Please read the romanization of the Belarusian article on Wikipedia.Lacinka is not an official form of language and its use is very limited. 5.197.251.205 (talk) 10:51, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

recent edit caused many referencing errors

@Cukrakalnis: your recent edit caused several referencing errors. I've made speculative fixes for them, but I'm not able to verify all the referenes and changes you made to the content. Are you able to do this yourself? Otherwise, I think the material should simply be reverted since it wasn't properly referenced. -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:06, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have verified each and every one of them, thank you for informing me about this. Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]