Talk:Bedhampton

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Proposed merge

The Bedhampton article is currently only a stub, and these articles, currently not linked in the article, should be merged into it instead of being separate. —Snigbrook 19:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I support this merge. Be bold. -- Secisek (talk) 20:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As there has been no disagreement, I have decided to merge the articles. If you believe this should not have happened, please use my talk page or discuss here before just changing it back Beefstu (talk) 00:03, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge complete! I have had to be fairly ruthless with the images to avoid swamping the page. Beefstu (talk) 00:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merged Pages

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bedhampton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links failed

Neither reference 2 nor 18 point to meaningful external resources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:5B9D:A01:D126:E89:9612:9C77 (talk) 13:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]