Talk:Be Sweet

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk12:09, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Converted from a redirect by Soulbust (talk). Self-nominated at 06:38, 3 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Be Sweet; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: QPQ just needs doing now, otherwise article's in great shape. My preference for hooks are 0>1>2, though I wonder if something like ALT3 ... that Japanese Breakfast released versions of their song "Be Sweet" in both Korean and Simlish?" would work just to make clear that they were official versions and not covers by other artists. How does that feel? —⁠Collint c 18:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Soulbust: in case you haven't seen this yet. Thanks! —⁠Collint c 17:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Collin, QPQ is now complete. Also, I really like the tweak in wording you suggested. I think it's better for sure, I was just trying to think of how to wikilink Be Sweet ahead of other possible links in my ALT0. But I prefer the wording you suggested. Thank you Soulbust (talk) 02:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Soulbust! QPQ is good and article is ready to go. I checked the hook guidelines and didn't see anything about the DYK article needing to be linked first so if you're happy with ALT3 then so am I. Striking the others. —⁠Collint c 15:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Be Sweet/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Soulbust (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Nkon21 (talk · contribs) 04:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I will review this within the next week. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 04:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Soulbust: I'm sorry for the delay as I am juggling a couple GANs at the moment, but I plan to review this within this upcoming week! ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 15:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

 Done, thanks to Dylan620 Soulbust (talk) 07:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 17:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Soulbust Just to let you know, the one week mark passed a few days ago. Are you still interested in promoting this article? ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 08:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi yes! Definitely still interested. Just been particularly busy offline the past couple/few weeks. Will try to get to this within the next ~18-24 hours. Thank you! Soulbust (talk) 04:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Soulbust and Nkon21, just wanted to drop a quick note that I've added alt text to each image. Dylan620 (he/him • talkedits) 23:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nkon21: Hi just pinging you to alert you that all comments have been addressed now :) Soulbust (talk) 07:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for letting me know, passing now ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 07:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.