This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Parliament constituencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK Parliament constituenciesWikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesTemplate:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesUK Parliament constituencies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
Trivia Section
Should this be removed? it does not really fit in with the tone of the rest of the article, adds little and lacks citations. Also Shapurji Saklatvala was never MP for this constituency, but one of its predecessors (Battersea North), so if the information on him is needed it should surely be on the Battersea North page.
With respect, you have not signed your comment of 2016. It has not had its subject-matter interfered with yet. So your punctiliousness about style and conformity does not match your own posts which need ~~~~ after them, kindly acknowledge the error. I think the word that grates with you is 'trivia' understandably not wishing to see that multiply; and agreeably too. I will rephrase. It is a bad habit from more trivial articles shall we say and those of a more light-hearted content.- Adam37Talk 12:47, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
