This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
QueenofBithynia, can you be more specific? What detail there is excessive? And how does this relate to the advert tag you added? – Muboshgu (talk) 22:16, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'll admit to not being an expert on US politics, but the detail of each political position seems excessive. Then again, comparing it to (what I assume to be) similar Congresspeople such as AOC, I will admit that I may have been mistaken. And that's a good article. (As for the advert tag, this amount of detail effectively reads as a résumé/CV and an endorsement of these opinions). Sorry to have wasted your time. QueenofBithynia (talk) 22:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a waste of time. Talk pages are for discussing ways to improve articles. Thank you for your points. Skimming it, there may be some things tightened up or cut. I haven't read it checking for CV/resume properties yet. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It could be more concise. Do we really need a section that a Democratic member of Congress opposes Donald Trump? TFD (talk) 02:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We don't. I removed it. The fact that it was positioned first shows me that someone stuck it in there with non-neutral intentions. Her impeachment votes could be relevant because impeachment is a BFD. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
