Talk:Awfully Chocolate

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

AfC comments

Comment: @Theroadislong:, Not a big deal. Maybe I didn't look close enough in the first place. I will take a more thorough look online later. For now I am going to just clean up some more in the queue for the backlog drive. Cheers! CNMall41 (talk) 21:41, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I didn't get that far because I thought [1] was a n interview so doesn't help with notability
this [2] is not a reliable source. This [3] was just a listing. Happy for you to revert though if you think it passes WP:NCORP. Theroadislong (talk) 21:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: @Theroadislong:, haha you beat me to this. Had it open when you declined it. I was actually going to approve it. What are your thoughts on the BBC article and the coverage in a college textbook? CNMall41 (talk) 21:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know what’s advertising about this as it states simple facts. It is also covered and featured in more references than I included but didn’t want to add more links than necessary. Here are more:

And books like this one:

https://books.google.com/books?id=mI9HDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT38&dq=%22awfully+chocolate%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiP6b6suePxAhVPnJ4KHTZVA64Q6AEwAXoECAsQAw

@Theroadislong:, I took a closer look and you are correct about the CNBC video. It is basically a feature of the company with the founder so not much for notability. However, I took a closer look at the book and there are actually two textbooks that use their founding as well as a number of others which review the product. There are also quite a few other references in English language foreign press. It could potentially be an AfD candidate but approving for now. Feel free to nominate though. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:53, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Awfully Chocolate

AfC comments

Navigation menu

Search