Talk:Australian White sheep

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Anglo-Nubian which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:45, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 January 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Andrewa (talk) 15:53, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



– Per WP:PRECISION and WP:RECOGNIZABLE, and for WP:CONSISTENCY with all the prior RMs that resulted in Nicastrese goat, Argentine Criollo cattle, Algerian Arab sheep, Anglo-Nubian goat, West African Dwarf goat, Indo-Brazilian cattle, British White cattle, Welsh Black cattle, Florida White rabbit, Anatolian Black cattle, Uzbek Black goat, Korean Native pig, etc.

All of these are descriptive of genuine human populations, and only animal breed experts would intuit that they don't refer to people, so the existing names fail WP:PRECISION policy (and probably also WP:RECOGNIZABLE, since only experts in obscure breeds of particular kinds of livestock, not domesticated animals generally, will recognize them at all). We routinely (and WP:NATURALly not parenthetically) disambiguate animal breed names in any cases where confusion may result. See years of previous RMs, and the contents of Category:Cattle breeds, Category:Goat breeds, Category:Rabbit breeds, etc.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  08:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC) In detail:[reply]

 — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  08:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support all per common sense reading of WP:CRITERIA In ictu oculi (talk) 08:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support all per above. Paintspot Infez (talk) 14:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support all Rreagan007 (talk) 16:43, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support the latter two per SMcCandlish. 142.161.81.20 (talk) 06:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Given the shipload of precedent, for exactly the same rationale, there's no cause to not support the first; it's the strongest case here.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  02:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Shouldn't the first be to "Australian White sheep", SMcCandlish? Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Good catch! At least someone followed the links before !voting. I propose to interpret it as intended under wp:snow. It's particularly red-face material as nom is the only editor of the proper target Australian White sheep as follows: 11:17, 2 October 2014‎ SMcCandlish (talk | contribs | block)‎ . . (51 bytes) (+51)‎ . . (redir) (thank) (which history is about to be overwritten). Andrewa (talk) 15:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Post move

SMcCandlish, is that all OK now? Andrewa (talk) 15:53, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Right! Got my sheep and rabbit moves confused.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  23:27, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Whew! All good then I think. Andrewa (talk) 10:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What happened was that in the course of noting that "Australian White" was just like "Welsh Black", "Florida White", etc., and needed to move, I also noticed the conflict between the Australian White sheep and Australian White rabbit breeds, and forgot which one I was actually editing the talk page of. I've corrected the RM text (with strikethrough) so the RM makes sense to later readers.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  12:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]