Talk:Australian Tertiary Admission Rank

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

More sources

Regards, -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs email 09:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NSW Bias

The Overview section of the article outlines how the ATAR is calculated for NSW and ACT students completing the HSC. However as ATAR is calculated differently in other states (I'm unaware of non-NSW and WA, but I know in Western Australia it is calculated using other methods (eg: only 4 subjects count, not 6, English doesn't have to count...). The article needs to be improved to outline the methods of other states also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EeeeeWarne (talkcontribs) 13:19, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, there is a "Changes from UAI" section, rather than a "Changes from previous ranking methods", which only focuses on NSW once again. EeeeeWarne (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to be bold and expand the article with any information that's currently missing. The article is incomplete and could always use some additional details. --benlisquareTCE 01:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Australian Tertiary Admission Rank. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]