Talk:August (Fringe episode)

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleAugust (Fringe episode) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starAugust (Fringe episode) is part of the Fringe (season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 7, 2011Good article nomineeListed
August 30, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 17, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Fringe actress Anna Torv considers "August" one of her favorite episodes?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:August (Fringe)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Queenieacoustic (talk) 10:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Plot

  •  Done In an attempt to save her,... Since her name hasn't been mentioned for a while, you should probably refer to her with her name here.

Besides that, the section is very well-written; it really felt like I was reading a good story. Kudos to you!

Production

  •  Done ...and that in the season's eight episode,... Should it be "eighth" or "eight episodes"?

Reception

  •  Done Josh Wigler from MTV.com thought the episode was "a touching, sad tale with a healthy mix of mythological advancement," and couldn't wait for more episodes on the Observers. (1) MTV shouldn't be italicized. Only italicize magazine titles. (2) "on the Observers" sounds awkward, write "about" instead.
  •  Done Ramsey Isler of IGN gave the episode 7.6/10, writing that despite the "hype," the episode was "just plain average". He did however appreciate the new revelations about the Observers. IGN shouldn't be italicized. Also, I don't think "hype" needs to be in quotation marks.
  •  Done ...Ken Tucker graded the episode an A-... Why is "A-" italicized?
  •  Done ..."good story peppered with a lot of great details... "August" showed a greater connection to the larger Fringe universe". Remember to use single quotation marks (') when quoting text inside quotes.
  •  Done Noel Murray of The A.V. Club graded the episode a B+, praised the "wonderfully moody" episode and how it was able to make the halting Observer dialogue work. "B+" shouldn't be italicized. Also, "the episode" is mentioned twice in a very narrow range. For example, you could write: ...praised it for being "wonderfully moody" etc.
  •  Done Remember to write (pictured) after "Anna Torv" in the image caption. Queenieacoustic (talk) 16:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Remember that you only need to source the extent of the material taken from the source, rather then source each sentence that uses the same source. For example, the two last sentences in the second paragraph of the Production section are from the same source, so you only need to source the last sentence.

  • This is normally true, but not if direct quotes are used. I am attributing Michael Cerveris' quote with a ref directly after the sentence. Ruby2010 comment! 16:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I didn't know that, thanks for telling me! I'll remember it in the future. Queenieacoustic (talk) 16:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And that's pretty much it, not too much to complain about since the article is written well. I'll put it on hold for seven days so that the issues can be fixed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 10:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the review! I'll make the changes later tomorrow (Saturday). Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 11:46, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I made the fixes requested above. Thanks again for the review! Ruby2010 comment! 16:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well done! GA. Queenieacoustic (talk) 16:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on August (Fringe). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on August (Fringe). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:29, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]