Talk:Asmara Moerni/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 14:09, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • In the lead you seem to assert that the film is certainly lost but in the lower section you say "The film is likely lost" which confuses me a little. Perhaps say that the film is considered to be lost in both?
  • No imdb entry on the film?
Makes you wonder how many notable films are missing for other non Anglo countries on there!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:29, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I thought it would be fine, I'm just trying to be picky on an article which is as sound as a pound!!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:29, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Very difficult to find any fault with this... It is technically sound and I'd imagine that you've already done well to find so much on a 1941 Indonesian film.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:11, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]