Talk:Architecture of Melbourne

	Australia portal Architecture of Melbourne is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Consensus

There are already two images of the Hotel Windsor in the Gallery and thus I have removed one and replaced it with the Fitzroy Town Hall Library exterior. If anyone has an dissent to this, please respond here. 58.166.224.181 (talk) 05:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Architecture of Melbourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111223142214/http://www.eurekaskydeck.com.au/fact-figure.html to http://www.eurekaskydeck.com.au/fact-figure.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re-write needed ?

The early part of this article draws heavily from a book about buildings now demolished, and has very detailed descriptions of some city buildings and not others, and nothing outside. Shouldn't it talk about the types of buildings and the various styles used ? I feel like this needs a very extensive re-write. The Sydney article is better, with more sections with more of an overview. I can do the re-write, but its a lot of work !

Rohanstorey (talk) 01:17, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Architecture of Melbourne

Consensus

External links modified

Re-write needed ?

Navigation menu

Search