Talk:Amnion

	This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Merge with amniotic sac?

Please see Amniotic sac talk page topic. /skagedal^... 08:43, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Amnios (biology)

Since "Amnion" is the more common term, as far as I know, I suggest Amnios (biology) be merged into this article. Nevertheless I also suggest either a disambiguation page for "Amnios", or that Amnios be moved to Amnios (computer game) and Amnios replace Amnios (biology) as a redirect. 83.253.13.90 (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Amnios (biology) merged Sept 2014

Ectoderm or Entoderm?

The article as is says "the extraembryonic ectoderm on the inner side" in the lead paragraph as well as in the subsequent section. I am totally inept in biology but when I looked at the "Section through the Embryo" and "Model of Human Embryo 1.3 mm long" pictures in the Additional Images section I saw the term entoderm being referred to instead of ectoderm. Can someone double check whether it's just my paranoia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.60.114.129 (talk) 10:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amnion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051226102224/http://sprojects.mmi.mcgill.ca:80/embryology/earlydev/week2/chorion%26ys.html to http://sprojects.mmi.mcgill.ca/embryology/earlydev/week2/chorion&ys.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lifted from Gray's word for word

Quoting without attribution is plagiarism. When the source is quite old, it is also a terrible way to write a scientific article. If you notice passages in this article which sound archaic in style, just Google some of their phrases, and Gray's Anatomy will pop up in the results. Pathetic.--75.164.142.57 (talk) 03:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]