Talk:American crow

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former good articleAmerican crow was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 4, 2006WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
October 18, 2007Good article nomineeListed
November 5, 2021Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 February 2021 and 13 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ms0615. Peer reviewers: R0a01gz, Rubiii1231.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

life span

What is the typical life span of this species? Funkyj 18:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use in film

The commentary short on the making of the opening sequence for Six Feet Under (found on disc 1 of the first season DVD collection) says that, for legal reasons, filmmakers must use pied crows with dyed plumage. Can anyone confirm this?

GA Passed

I have passed this article's GA because I believe it feels the GA criteria, being well written, factually accurate, broad in coverage, neutral, and stable. To take this article further, I think a few more inline cites are needed, and a few sections could be fleshed out more. I personally would like to see a more developed section on Nesting and maybe fleshing out Crows in Popular Culture - it's a little too like a Trivia section at the moment. Good work overall, and a great corvid article. Cheers, Corvus coronoides talk 14:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps (on hold)

Hi again. This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed. There is one {{fact}} tag that needs to be taken care of. I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made and issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Regards, Corvus coronoides talk 23:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps (Pass)

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Corvus coronoides talk 14:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confused about Long-Distance Visual ID

The text says: If seen flying at a distance from where size estimates are unreliable, the distinctly larger Common Ravens (C. corax) can be distinguished by their almost lozenge-shaped tail...

But, the Raven entry says: Apart from its greater size, the Common Raven differs from its cousins, the crows, by having a larger and heavier beak, a shaggy throat, and a wedge-shaped tail.

What I remember from a vertebrate biology class from about a hundred years ago, the second entry is correct. The raven has a wedge -- or somewhat diamond -- shaped tail in flight; the crow has the lozenge tail. I'm not sure, however.

Should this be changed?

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eoraptor013 (talk • contribs) 20:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minor formating edit

I edited the Taxonomy headline so it was no longer obscured by the sound sample.--Evilbred (talk) 13:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crow feathers in ultraviolet light

I've read about how the American crow has the ability to see ultraviolet light, and how their feathers show brilliant patterns when viewed with an ultraviolet camera. It would be neat if some information on this was added/found. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chemtype (talk • contribs) 01:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sexual dimorphism

As with lots of birds that mate long term, males and females look a lot alike (not like robins, for example). Are there tell-tale differences? Among raptors, one sex is usually bigger than the other (males in half the species and females in the other half). What about American crows? Are males and females the same size? Leadwind (talk) 23:35, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Distinguishing

"It is also distinguished from the Raven by its smaller, more curved bill than the parallel bill of the raven, and its squared tail." This may be mistaken. The top of a raven's bill is curved; the top of a crow's bill is straight. http://www.allaboutbirds.org/page.aspx?pid=2501 http://mag.audubon.org/articles/birds/how-tell-ravens-crow Kortoso (talk) 01:18, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fan-tailed Raven which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fan-tailed raven which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

lead should describe crows

A lead should summarize the article and create interest in the topic, see WP:LEAD. The lead talks about carrion crows, hooded crows, ravens, fish crows, and West Nile virus. It should do more to describe the American crow. The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise summary of the topic Jonathan Tweet (talk) 03:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on American crow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

== "CaaW-CaaW-CaaW!" == (I SEE SOMTHING)

The opening paragraph of this article contains the line: "The most usual call is CaaW!-CaaW!-CaaW!."

In the section Description, there is a similar line: "The most usual call is a loud, short, and rapid caaw-caaw-caaw."

I don't know if writing onomatopoeia for bird cries is standard on Wikipedia, but this seems a bit out of place to me. Other birds with distinctive calls, such as the Kookaburra, seem to just have audio files that one can listen to. Should the crow have its call written like this? Wondering Wanderer (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Wondering Wanderer: Hi. I agree that it seems strange and unencyclopedic to me too. There is no citation given for the caaw-caaw-caaw, but it seems to have been copied from this website without attribution. The description in the opening paragraph seems to come from this website, again without attribution. I have no idea how reliable those two sources are. Perhaps consider rewording it. From a quick google search, the call has also been described as cawing/cawlike/"caw-caw". Bennv3771 (talk) 09:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unclear sentence in intro

The current revision has a sentence with a strange "because from because from" construction that is very hard to understand.

" They can be distinguished from the common raven (C. corax) because American crows are smaller, from the fish crow (C. ossifragus) because American crows do not hunch and fluff their throat feathers when they call and from the carrion crow (C. corone) by the enunciation of their calls.

Can someone nice clean this up? I would but I cannot figure the original intention behind the sentence. -- Diletante (talk) 22:21, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Murder

A group of crows is called a murder. Drsruli (talk) 09:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't a "murder" of crows shown as the collective plural form of crows? Why hide it? Northernxy (talk) 01:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know, but it ambiguously admissible in the Wiki. Why hide it? It's such an interesting English term for birds. Northernxy (talk) 01:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article is a mess

This article has been in poor shape for years. I don't think this article still remains as GA. 119.193.102.31 (talk) 10:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:American_crow"